Calcium Catastrophe

Generally speaking, a sudden drastic change in the chemistry of your environment is catastrophic. From bacteria to humans, there is a range of chemistry we can tolerate, and outside that range we tend to die.

I mentioned one major geochemical event last year, when free atmospheric oxygen first became common. That was a pretty catastrophic change for the living creatures (bacteria) who were adapted to the pre-oxygen conditions of the early earth.

Some time after that, another major geochemical event happened. Some researchers now think that this led directly to the cambrian explosion and to more complex life on earth. Even so, it was a catastrophic change—from the point of view of the creatures who didn't survive it.

Magnetic soap

This video demonstrates a nifty advance in surfactant science: unfortunately I can't include it here, so you have to click on supporting information then the .mpg video file link to see it.

What is shown on the right, sticking to the metallic disk being lowered into the liquid, is magnetic soap. (On the left is normal, non-magnetic soap.) The little yellow blob that lifted with the magnet-on-a-stick through the clear liquid and then fell when the magnet was lifted right out of the liquid, is the soap itself.

Three different non-magnetic surfactants were made magnetic by reacting them with ferric chloride, a common industrial chemical.

A solution of ferric chloride by itself also reacts very slightly to magnets, but it finds most of its use as a coagulant, not as a soap.

Acid and oxygen

Acid rock drainage is one of the big environmental problems facing hard rock mines, because it keeps going for decades after the mine is closed and abandoned, poisoning everything downstream with the toxic metals leached from the rock. It's a natural process that occurs wherever rock is exposed to oxygen and water; metal sulphides are oxidized by the oxygen to dissolved metal and sulphuric acid. Exposed rock is eventually consumed until there is little to no unreacted metal or sulphide accessible to oxygen.

However, as the process requires oxygen, it couldn't happen until the earth's atmosphere actually had oxygen in it. I haven't yet found a definitive description of what exactly the earth's atmospheric composition was before the change, but the difference between chemistry with and without oxygen is pretty clear, as oxygen is highly reactive and tends to get into everything. For one, the acid rock drainage I mentioned above. Another indication is the type of iron minerals deposited—with or without oxygen, and how much oxygen. As iron combines very easily with oxygen, if you find an iron deposit without any oxygen there's a good chance no oxygen was available to it at the time it was formed.

Hydrophones at depth

Here's a nifty new piece of technology from Stanford University for any ocean-science types: a hydrophone that can be used at any depth which has low-distortion sound detection over a dynamic range of 160dB and a frequency range of 1Hz to 100,000Hz. By contrast, the human ear can hear a range of about 20-20,000Hz, feels immediate and acute pain at about 120dB—chronic damage starts much lower, down about 85dB. (If you want to know what 120dB feels like, stand about 3m in front of an emergency vehicle with its siren sounding.)

Most microphones have a thin diaphragm which vibrates in response to the sound waves hitting it, and this one is no exception. However, when you're detecting tiny pressure changes against the crush of a deep ocean trench, you need something that will not be overwhelmed by the ambient pressure. The answer for this particular microphone was to drill tiny holes in the diaphragm so that the water pressure on both sides of the diaphragm is the same. The holes would have to be small enough that sound waves in the water wouldn't pass right through them without moving the diaphragm, and large enough that the pressure would equalize before damaging the diaphragm as it's brought to depth. The diaphragm itself is about 500nm thick, so it is very fragile. To measure the movement of such a fragile surface, they use a laser. This is highly accurate and also doesn't touch the diaphragm with anything other than light. At the quiet end of the sounds they wanted to measure, and with water resisting the motion of the diaphragm, it moves only about 0.00001nm or so. Fortunately, lasers and mirrors can detect that sort of tiny movement.

Different sizes of diaphragms (and drumskins, and sound boards, and strings, and horn tubes) are most responsive to a particular frequency, so to cover the full range of frequencies they wanted to hear without distortion would be tricky with only one diaphragm. So, they put three different sizes of diaphragm in one microphone to cover the range.